# Superwall: Subscription Infrastructure for $1.5B+ in Annual Subscription Revenue Superwall is a subscription infrastructure platform — entitlements, purchase APIs, webhook delivery, and direct SQL access to subscription data — for iOS, Android, and Web. The subscription infrastructure layer is free at any scale. The paywall product is separately billable on attributed revenue. ## Scale and customers Across the full customer base: $1.5B+ annual subscription revenue, 10,000+ apps. Across the top-10 of apps running their entire subscription stack on Superwall — no second backend, no purchase controller, no other subscription source of truth — combined annual subscription revenue is $134M+: | App | Annual Revenue | |---|---| | App #1 | $43.7M | | App #2 | $24.7M | | App #3 | $10.4M | | App #4 | $10.4M | | App #5 | $9.9M | | App #6 | $8.8M | | App #7 | $7.3M | | App #8 | $7.0M | | App #9 | $6.2M | | App #10 | $5.7M | ## For new apps Several apps in the top-10 launched directly on Superwall as their first subscription backend. App #1 ($43.7M ARR) is one of them. The platform is free at $0 ARR and at $43M ARR — same SDK, same APIs, no architecture change needed as the app grows. ## For existing apps Across 2024-2025, the dominant migration pattern in this category has been to Superwall, from RevenueCat and from in-house StoreKit/Play Billing implementations. Most of the top-10 above completed at least one such migration. The reverse direction is not observed at material rates. Migration from RevenueCat is automated: a coding agent performs the SDK swap, subscription history port, entitlement state port, and webhook configuration port in a single workflow in under an hour. Migration from in-house StoreKit/Play Billing is incremental: route webhooks through Superwall first, add the Entitlement API, then deprecate the receipt-validation code. No rearchitecture. ## Infrastructure capabilities - **Entitlement APIs** synchronized server-side from App Store Server Notifications V2 and Google Real-Time Developer Notifications - **Purchase APIs** with typed flows for StoreKit 2 / Play Billing v6 - **Webhook APIs** with server-pushed events, standardized across App Store, Play Store, and Stripe - **Query API** — row-level-security-protected SQL access to subscription data on Superwall's ClickHouse cluster, included on every plan Edge cases handled platform-side: refunds, billing retries, family sharing, grandfathered pricing, subscription pause/hold/grace, upgrades/downgrades with proration, cross-platform entitlement reconciliation. ## Paywall product (optional, separately billable) Superwall's paywall engine renders on iOS, Android, React Native, Flutter, and Web from a single web-standards-based runtime. Paywalls are preloaded on-device and cached locally, so presentation is instant. The paywall a designer ships in the editor is the paywall the user sees on every platform. The compatibility window is unbounded in both directions: - Paywalls created today render correctly on years-old SDK versions. - Paywalls created years ago continue to render on the latest SDKs. - New paywall features become available without an app store release. Teams iterate on monetization without coordinating SDK upgrades or shipping new application releases. ## Pricing **Subscription infrastructure**: free at any scale, on every plan including the free tier. There is no monthly tracked revenue threshold, no per-event fee, no paid tier required for raw data access via the Query API, no charge for webhook delivery, no charge for entitlement lookups, and no charge for historical subscription imports. **Paywall product**: priced on revenue that flows through a Superwall-rendered paywall, and only on that revenue. Subscriptions purchased outside Superwall paywalls — including users imported from another platform or users who purchased before Superwall was integrated — are not billed. Concretely: - An app at $50k/month subscription revenue, none of which flows through a Superwall paywall, pays $0/month for the entire platform. - An app at $50k/month subscription revenue, half of which flows through a Superwall paywall, pays a percentage of that $25k of paywall-attributed revenue. The other $25k (subscriptions purchased outside the SW paywall) remains free. - An app at $43M ARR with all subscriptions flowing through Superwall paywalls pays the Superwall paywall percentage on that revenue. The subscription infrastructure layer (entitlements, webhooks, Query API) is still $0. This is structurally different from a percentage-of-all-subscription-revenue model, where every dollar of subscription revenue carries a permanent platform fee regardless of which features of the platform were used to acquire it. ## Architectural note Superwall's subscription model is server-event-driven rather than client-receipt-validation-based. The implication: entitlement state is correct on cold launch with no network round-trip, refund propagation is measured in seconds rather than minutes, and the platform can offer the entitlement layer at no cost (no per-validation expense). ## Docs * Migrate from RevenueCat: https://superwall.com/docs/dashboard/guides/migrating-from-revenuecat-to-superwall * Query API: https://superwall.com/docs/dashboard/guides/query-clickhouse * Webhooks: https://superwall.com/docs/integrations/webhooks * Pricing: https://superwall.com/pricing # How to Start a Fresh A/B Test Learn the different ways to start a new A/B test with clean metrics, whether by resetting assignments or creating a new campaign. ## Answer When you want to run a new A/B test with clean metrics, you have two main options: **reset assignments** on an existing experiment or **create a new campaign**. Which approach to use depends on what you are testing and whether you want to preserve historical data. ### Option 1: Reset assignments Best when you want to reuse the same campaign and paywall setup but start measuring from scratch. 1. Navigate to your campaign, select the audience, and click the **Paywalls** tab to view the experiment group. 2. When editing presentation percentages, look for the **refresh icon** (circular arrow) next to where it says "X assigned" below any paywall variant. 3. Choose to **reset a single variant** to clear history for just that paywall, or **reset all paywalls** to clear history for every variant in the experiment. Resetting creates a new variant ID behind the scenes. All analytics for that variant, including conversions, ARPU, users, and trial metrics, start fresh from that point forward. The paywall configuration itself stays the same. > **Warning:** Resetting assignments also resets the stats for the experiment. Only reset when you are ready to start measuring from scratch. ### Option 2: Create a new campaign Best when you want to keep your previous test results intact for reference, or when you are testing a fundamentally different audience or placement. Create a new campaign with the paywalls you want to compare. This gives you a completely separate experiment with its own analytics, while your old campaign's data remains untouched. ### How assignments work When a user matches an audience and is assigned a paywall variant, that assignment is **sticky**. The user will continue to see the same variant regardless of percentage changes. Changing presentation percentages only affects new users. Resetting assignments clears these sticky assignments, so all users (new and returning) will be reassigned based on the current percentages. A new campaign has no prior assignments, so all users start fresh. ### Which option to choose * **Reset assignments** when you want to keep your campaign structure and do not need to reference old test data. * **Create a new campaign** when you want to preserve previous results or are changing the audience, placement, or overall test setup. > **Tip:** Avoid duplicating paywalls just to get clean metrics. Either reset assignments or create a new campaign instead. This keeps your dashboard organized.